<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McAfee Security Center?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://AdwareDetection.com/blog/mcafee-security-center-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://AdwareDetection.com/blog/mcafee-security-center-4/</link>
	<description>AdwareDetection.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 18:34:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jumpguy92</title>
		<link>http://AdwareDetection.com/blog/mcafee-security-center-4/comment-page-1/#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator>jumpguy92</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://AdwareDetection.com/blog/mcafee-security-center-4/#comment-309</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve heard lots of stories about McAffe, but from personal use, I reckon it&#039;s one of the best ones out there. The phishing detector saved me once, the real-time scanner detected some spyware before, and overall, it&#039;s done it&#039;s job and has kept my computer completely virus-free (your common sense has to play a part too, like not opening unknown attachments in emails, and keeping Windows up-to-date). It&#039;s never put me wrong. The reason it might not be detecting anything is that there might not be anything to detect! You might just be a safe, informed internet-user who doesn&#039;t do stupid things that can land you in trouble.
So overall, I think McAffe is well worth it&#039;s money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard lots of stories about McAffe, but from personal use, I reckon it&#8217;s one of the best ones out there. The phishing detector saved me once, the real-time scanner detected some spyware before, and overall, it&#8217;s done it&#8217;s job and has kept my computer completely virus-free (your common sense has to play a part too, like not opening unknown attachments in emails, and keeping Windows up-to-date). It&#8217;s never put me wrong. The reason it might not be detecting anything is that there might not be anything to detect! You might just be a safe, informed internet-user who doesn&#8217;t do stupid things that can land you in trouble.<br />
So overall, I think McAffe is well worth it&#8217;s money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhea</title>
		<link>http://AdwareDetection.com/blog/mcafee-security-center-4/comment-page-1/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 08:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://AdwareDetection.com/blog/mcafee-security-center-4/#comment-308</guid>
		<description>Well, I has McAfee. My sister had Norton. One day my sister&#039;s internet didn&#039;t work so I called the at&amp;t people to see what the problem was. They said that McAfee and Norton had strong firewalls or something. So when I deleted Norton from my computer, the internet began to work. My dad has AVG so I put on the frre edition of AVG and it worked even better. So I guess McAfee has bad service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I has McAfee. My sister had Norton. One day my sister&#8217;s internet didn&#8217;t work so I called the at&#038;t people to see what the problem was. They said that McAfee and Norton had strong firewalls or something. So when I deleted Norton from my computer, the internet began to work. My dad has AVG so I put on the frre edition of AVG and it worked even better. So I guess McAfee has bad service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

